Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RGAGX
GFACX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RGAGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.76
Change-$0.81 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$78.43
Change-$0.94 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
GFACX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX (310B) and RGAGX (306B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RGAGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: RGAGX (0.65) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: GFACX (24 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). GFACX (25.00) and RGAGX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. GFACX (250) and RGAGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. GFACX (6.34). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.11 vs. GFACX (39.11).
| GFACX | RGAGX | GFACX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.30 | 453% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.30 | 453% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.705 | 5.205 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 306B | 101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 7.67 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.73 | 54.66 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 51.11 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.69 | 75.62 | 74% |