Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RBCGX
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$67.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.32M
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RBCGX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and RBCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. RBCGX (73.3M). GFACX (0.00) and RBCGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFACX (25 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFACX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.61 vs. RBCGX (-3.76). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.81 vs. RBCGX (-3.90).
| GFACX | RBCGX | GFACX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.01 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.01 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.760 | -0.252 | -2,681% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 73.3M | 462,483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | -3.76 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.24 | 59.84 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | -3.90 | -328% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.42 | 18.54 | 391% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement