Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RBCGX
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$65.42
Change-$15.57 (-19.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.24M
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RBCGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RBCGX (71.2M). GFACX (0.00) and RBCGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFACX (25 years) vs RBCGX (38 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFACX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. RBCGX (-6.22). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. RBCGX (-13.78).
| GFACX | RBCGX | GFACX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.01 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.01 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -1.357 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 71.2M | 471,910% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -6.22 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 41.14 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -13.78 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 29.85 | 314% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement