Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RBCGX
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$78.37
Change-$1.78 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.94M
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RBCGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and RBCGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. RBCGX (76.9M). GFACX (0.00) and RBCGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFACX (25 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFACX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.13 vs. GFACX (4.61). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.87 vs. RBCGX (13.56).
| GFACX | RBCGX | GFACX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.01 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.01 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.343 | 18.864 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 76.9M | 442,133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | 11.13 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.17 | 70.57 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.87 | 13.56 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.78 | 37.20 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement