Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOYX
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$152.01
Change-$2.62 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.65B
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOYX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and PNOYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PNOYX (6.65B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOYX (0.57) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOYX (0.62). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.61 vs. PNOYX (1.18). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.87 vs. PNOYX (24.83).
| GFACX | PNOYX | GFACX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.343 | 11.413 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 6.65B | 5,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | 1.18 | 390% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.17 | 39.83 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.87 | 24.83 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.78 | 100.54 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement