Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOYX
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.73
Change-$0.27 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.36B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$148.50
Change-$0.11 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.55B
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOYX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and PNOYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. PNOYX (6.55B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOYX (0.59) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOYX (0.62). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. PNOYX (-2.94). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.40 vs. PNOYX (22.41).
| GFACX | PNOYX | GFACX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.205 | 6.996 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 6.55B | 5,164% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.51 | -2.94 | -290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.52 | 49.90 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.40 | 22.41 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.81 | 91.46 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement