Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOPX
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$133.81
Change-$2.30 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.65B
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and PNOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PNOPX (6.65B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOPX (0.43) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOPX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOPX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.76 vs. PNOPX (0.01). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.74 vs. PNOPX (18.92).
| GFACX | PNOPX | GFACX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.946 | 11.174 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 6.65B | 5,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.76 | 0.01 | 45,140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.80 | 36.03 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.74 | 18.92 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.09 | 84.42 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement