Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOPX
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.08
Change+$0.45 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$136.78
Change+$0.41 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.76B
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PNOPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PNOPX (6.76B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOPX (0.43) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOPX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOPX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.93 vs. PNOPX (-1.81). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.08 vs. PNOPX (17.33).
| GFACX | PNOPX | GFACX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.115 | 11.272 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 6.76B | 5,013% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.93 | -1.81 | -272% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.70 | 34.73 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.08 | 17.33 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.33 | 78.62 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement