Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOPX
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$123.43
Change+$0.06 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.68B
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOPX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and PNOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PNOPX (6.68B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOPX (0.43) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than PNOPX (0.88). PNOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOPX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.61 vs. PNOPX (-1.84). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.81 vs. PNOPX (11.90).
| GFACX | PNOPX | GFACX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.88 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.88 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.760 | 0.817 | 828% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 6.68B | 5,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | -1.84 | -196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.24 | 40.66 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | 11.90 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.42 | 82.69 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement