Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOCX
GFACX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$80.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
GFACX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and PNOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PNOCX (6.7B). PNOCX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOCX (0.02) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). PNOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOCX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.61 vs. PNOCX (-7.46). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.81 vs. PNOCX (-7.63).
| GFACX | PNOCX | GFACX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.62 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.62 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.760 | -4.942 | -137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 6.7B | 5,062% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | -7.46 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.24 | 25.06 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | -7.63 | -168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.42 | 35.40 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement