Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOCX
GFACX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$90.77
Change+$0.56 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.56B
GFACX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and PNOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. PNOCX (6.56B). PNOCX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOCX (0.02) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOCX (22.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOCX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. PNOCX (-7.08). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. PNOCX (-0.22).
| GFACX | PNOCX | GFACX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.62 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.62 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 6.550 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 6.56B | 5,141% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | -7.08 | -133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 28.71 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | -0.22 | -14,003% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | 36.42 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers