Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PBCKX
GFACX vs PBCKX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PBCKX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Principal Blue Chip Institutional
Price$42.15
Change+$0.10 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
GFACX vs PBCKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PBCKX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and PBCKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PBCKX (9.91B). PBCKX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PBCKX (0.02) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PBCKX: GFACX (25 years) vs PBCKX (14 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than PBCKX (0.70). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PBCKX (20.90). PBCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PBCKX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.47 vs. PBCKX (-10.45). PBCKX return over 5 years is better than : 22.77 vs. GFACX (12.83).
| GFACX | PBCKX | GFACX / PBCKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.66 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.70 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.775 | -8.010 | -85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 9.91B | 3,423% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.47 | -10.45 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.11 | 50.20 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.83 | 22.77 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.12 | 170.90 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement