Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MSHPX
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$13.40
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.71M
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHPX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MSHPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. MSHPX (5.71M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHPX (2.26) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: GFACX (25 years) vs MSHPX (6 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: GFACX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.47 vs. MSHPX (2.84). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.83 vs. MSHPX (-4.29).
| GFACX | MSHPX | GFACX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.80 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 10.50 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.775 | 4.687 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 5.71M | 5,937,993% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.47 | 2.84 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.11 | 22.87 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.83 | -4.29 | -299% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement