Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MSHPX
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$15.43
Change-$0.04 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.72M
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MSHPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. MSHPX (5.72M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHPX (2.20) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: GFACX (25 years) vs MSHPX (6 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: GFACX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). MSHPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.92 vs. GFACX (9.41). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. MSHPX (10.43).
| GFACX | MSHPX | GFACX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 10.50 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 20.547 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 5.72M | 5,889,549% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 9.92 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 46.87 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 10.43 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement