Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MSHOX
GFACX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$12.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.71M
GFACX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHOX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. MSHOX (5.71M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHOX (1.13) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFACX (25 years) vs MSHOX (6 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFACX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.47 vs. MSHOX (1.45). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.83 vs. MSHOX (-11.05).
| GFACX | MSHOX | GFACX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.95 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 13.89 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.775 | 3.276 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 5.71M | 5,937,993% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.47 | 1.45 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.11 | 17.34 | 324% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.83 | -11.05 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement