Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MSHMX
GFACX vs MSHMX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHMX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence I
Price$13.10
Change-$2.40 (-15.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.76M
GFACX vs MSHMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHMX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MSHMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHMX (5.76M). MSHMX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHMX (0.56) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHMX: GFACX (25 years) vs MSHMX (6 years). MSHMX (7.16) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). MSHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHMX: GFACX (250) vs MSHMX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. MSHMX (-1.98). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. MSHMX (-6.73).
| GFACX | MSHMX | GFACX / MSHMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.85 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 7.16 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | 0.614 | -177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 5.76M | 5,829,285% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -1.98 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 6.04 | 600% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -6.73 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement