Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MRFOX
GFACX vs MRFOX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MRFOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity
Price$34.61
Change+$0.08 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
GFACX vs MRFOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MRFOX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MRFOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. MRFOX (1.32B). MRFOX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MRFOX (0.88) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MRFOX: GFACX (25 years) vs MRFOX (10 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than MRFOX (1.12). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MRFOX (6.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRFOX: GFACX (250) vs MRFOX (10000). MRFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. GFACX (3.47). MRFOX return over 5 years is better than : 69.83 vs. GFACX (12.83).
| GFACX | MRFOX | GFACX / MRFOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.02 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.12 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.775 | 9.065 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 1.32B | 25,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.88 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.47 | 7.84 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.11 | 45.07 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.83 | 69.83 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement