Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MLINX
GFACX vs MLINX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MLINX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Inv Class
Price$7.80
Change-$2.77 (-26.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.65B
GFACX vs MLINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MLINX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MLINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MLINX (12.7B). GFACX (0.00) and MLINX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MLINX: GFACX (25 years) vs MLINX (18 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than MLINX (1.14). MLINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLINX: GFACX (250) vs MLINX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. MLINX (-15.77). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. MLINX (-35.64).
| GFACX | MLINX | GFACX / MLINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.13 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.14 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -4.762 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 12.7B | 2,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -15.77 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 5.83 | 621% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -35.64 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | -1.76 | -5,313% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers