Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MLACX
GFACX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.33
Change-$0.74 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$2.71
Change-$0.04 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.97B
GFACX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MLACX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MLACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MLACX (13B). GFACX (0.00) and MLACX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MLACX: GFACX (25 years) vs MLACX (21 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: GFACX (250) vs MLACX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.90 vs. MLACX (-36.24). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.69 vs. MLACX (-68.56).
| GFACX | MLACX | GFACX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.89 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.530 | -1.455 | -105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 13B | 2,585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.90 | -36.24 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.58 | -38.83 | -123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.69 | -68.56 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.34 | -63.72 | -150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers