Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MCGFX
GFACX vs MCGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MCGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$14.04
Change+$0.07 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.22M
GFACX vs MCGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MCGFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MCGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. MCGFX (207M). GFACX (0.00) and MCGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MCGFX: GFACX (25 years) vs MCGFX (31 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than MCGFX (0.97). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: GFACX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. MCGFX (4.93). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. MCGFX (-38.66).
| GFACX | MCGFX | GFACX / MCGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.97 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 14.706 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 207M | 162,802% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 4.93 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 41.78 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | -38.66 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | -45.77 | -176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement