Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLQX
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.14
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R2
Price$51.91
Change+$0.13 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.68B
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLQX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LGLQX (7.68B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLQX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLQX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLQX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLQX (1.25). LGLQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLQX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLQX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.66 vs. GFACX (5.80). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.23 vs. LGLQX (21.94).
| GFACX | LGLQX | GFACX / LGLQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.25 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.25 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.322 | 14.845 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.68B | 4,415% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 11.66 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.29 | 99.27 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.23 | 21.94 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.11 | 125.99 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement