Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLQX
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R2
Price$53.09
Change-$0.10 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.94B
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLQX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LGLQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. LGLQX (7.94B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLQX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLQX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLQX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLQX (1.25). LGLQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLQX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLQX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.83 vs. GFACX (9.41). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. LGLQX (18.90).
| GFACX | LGLQX | GFACX / LGLQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.25 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.25 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 17.456 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 7.94B | 4,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 28.83 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 112.87 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 18.90 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | 129.33 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement