Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLQX
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$69.07
Change-$0.20 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R2
Price$52.14
Change+$0.21 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.77B
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLQX commentary
Jan 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LGLQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGLQX (7.77B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLQX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLQX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLQX (15 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than LGLQX (1.25). LGLQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). LGLQX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLQX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.84 vs. GFACX (7.99). LGLQX return over 5 years is better than : 13.10 vs. GFACX (10.83).
| GFACX | LGLQX | GFACX / LGLQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.25 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.25 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.630 | 1.796 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 7.77B | 4,324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.99 | 15.84 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.18 | 111.44 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.83 | 13.10 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.46 | 156.09 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers