Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLQX
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R2
Price$52.11
Change-$1.72 (-3.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLQX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and LGLQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. LGLQX (8.01B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLQX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLQX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLQX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLQX (1.25). LGLQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLQX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLQX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.30 vs. GFACX (6.76). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.74 vs. LGLQX (22.93).
| GFACX | LGLQX | GFACX / LGLQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.25 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.25 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.946 | 19.093 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 8.01B | 4,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.76 | 19.30 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.80 | 112.77 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.74 | 22.93 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.09 | 133.84 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement