Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLFX
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.08
Change+$0.45 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$56.97
Change+$0.15 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LGLFX (7.83B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.75). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLFX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.36 vs. GFACX (4.93). LGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.35 vs. GFACX (23.08).
| GFACX | LGLFX | GFACX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.75 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.115 | 17.164 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.83B | 4,330% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.93 | 15.36 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.70 | 105.78 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.08 | 30.35 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.33 | 149.48 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement