Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLCX
GFACX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.39
Change-$1.18 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$45.19
Change-$1.17 (-2.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.9B
GFACX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LGLCX (7.9B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLCX (14 years). LGLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFACX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.86 vs. GFACX (4.75). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 24.59 vs. LGLCX (16.98).
| GFACX | LGLCX | GFACX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.65 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.65 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.091 | 15.323 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.9B | 4,293% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 10.86 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.47 | 105.95 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.59 | 16.98 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.45 | 114.93 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers