Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLCX
GFACX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$47.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
GFACX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LGLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGLCX (7.96B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLCX (14 years). LGLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFACX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.33 vs. GFACX (9.41). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. LGLCX (13.18).
| GFACX | LGLCX | GFACX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.65 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.65 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 17.090 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 7.96B | 4,221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 28.33 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 110.32 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 13.18 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | 109.76 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement