Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLCX
GFACX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$43.95
Change-$4.96 (-10.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.47B
GFACX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LGLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGLCX (7.47B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLCX (15 years). LGLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFACX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. GFACX (0.14). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. LGLCX (0.57).
| GFACX | LGLCX | GFACX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.65 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.65 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -2.873 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 7.47B | 4,496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | 5.19 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 90.42 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | 0.57 | 702% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 128.67 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers