Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLAX
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$55.64
Change-$0.10 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.94B
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LGLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. LGLAX (7.94B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLAX (0.90). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFACX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.28 vs. GFACX (9.41). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. LGLAX (22.04).
| GFACX | LGLAX | GFACX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.90 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.90 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 17.782 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 7.94B | 4,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 29.28 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 115.16 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 22.04 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | 140.45 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement