Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLAX
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.08
Change+$0.45 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$54.49
Change+$0.14 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLAX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LGLAX (7.83B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLAX (0.90). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFACX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.19 vs. GFACX (5.80). LGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.03 vs. GFACX (23.23).
| GFACX | LGLAX | GFACX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.90 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.90 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.322 | 15.347 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.83B | 4,330% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 12.19 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.29 | 101.59 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.23 | 25.03 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.11 | 137.22 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers