Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLAX
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.33
Change-$0.74 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$53.86
Change-$0.89 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.8B
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGLAX (7.8B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLAX (15 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than LGLAX (0.90). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFACX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. GFACX (6.90). LGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.70 vs. GFACX (10.69).
| GFACX | LGLAX | GFACX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.90 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.90 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.530 | 0.167 | 914% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 7.8B | 4,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.90 | 14.33 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.58 | 110.47 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.69 | 15.70 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.34 | 164.41 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement