Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LFGCX
GFACX vs LFGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LFGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.39
Change-$1.18 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
Price$39.35
Change-$1.13 (-2.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.15M
GFACX vs LFGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LFGCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LFGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LFGCX (173M). GFACX (0.00) and LFGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LFGCX: GFACX (25 years) vs LFGCX (7 years). LFGCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). LFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGCX: GFACX (250) vs LFGCX (1500). LFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.69 vs. GFACX (4.75). LFGCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.51 vs. GFACX (24.59).
| GFACX | LFGCX | GFACX / LFGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.80 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.20 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.091 | 17.062 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 173M | 195,954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 12.69 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.47 | 117.87 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.59 | 40.51 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement