Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LFGCX
GFACX vs LFGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LFGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
Price$38.09
Change-$3.40 (-8.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.61M
GFACX vs LFGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LFGCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LFGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LFGCX (155M). GFACX (0.00) and LFGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LFGCX: GFACX (25 years) vs LFGCX (7 years). LFGCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). LFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGCX: GFACX (250) vs LFGCX (1500). LFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.75 vs. GFACX (0.14). LFGCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.16 vs. GFACX (4.02).
| GFACX | LFGCX | GFACX / LFGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.80 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.20 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -3.300 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 155M | 216,774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | 5.75 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 100.16 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | 20.16 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers