Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCSX
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$17.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KLCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. KLCSX (1.17B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFACX (25 years) vs KLCSX (12 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: KLCSX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.47 vs. KLCSX (-10.38). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.83 vs. KLCSX (-51.43).
| GFACX | KLCSX | GFACX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.78 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.87 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.775 | -7.215 | -94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 1.17B | 28,876% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.47 | -10.38 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.11 | -12.32 | -455% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.83 | -51.43 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.12 | -8.49 | -873% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement