Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCSX
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$22.09
Change+$0.08 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KLCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. KLCSX (1.29B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFACX (25 years) vs KLCSX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: KLCSX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. KLCSX (-9.98). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. KLCSX (-37.12).
| GFACX | KLCSX | GFACX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.78 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 18.065 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 1.29B | 26,226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | -9.98 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | -9.13 | -709% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | -37.12 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | 17.88 | 451% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement