Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCIX
GFACX vs KLCIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
Price$16.50
Change-$5.48 (-24.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
GFACX vs KLCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KLCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KLCIX (1.09B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCIX: GFACX (25 years) vs KLCIX (18 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.95). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: GFACX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. KLCIX (-12.33). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. KLCIX (-54.88).
| GFACX | KLCIX | GFACX / KLCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.84 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.95 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -1.610 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 1.09B | 30,713% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -12.33 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | -21.65 | -167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -54.88 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 0.36 | 25,670% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement