Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCIX
GFACX vs KLCIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
Price$21.71
Change+$0.08 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
GFACX vs KLCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCIX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KLCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. KLCIX (1.29B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCIX: GFACX (25 years) vs KLCIX (18 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.94). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: GFACX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. KLCIX (-10.44). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. KLCIX (-37.92).
| GFACX | KLCIX | GFACX / KLCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 17.989 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 1.29B | 26,226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | -10.44 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | -10.10 | -641% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | -37.92 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | 15.97 | 505% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement