Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCCX
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$7.21
Change-$5.23 (-42.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KLCCX (1.09B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFACX (25 years) vs KLCCX (18 years). KLCCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFACX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. KLCCX (-32.81). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. KLCCX (-76.96).
| GFACX | KLCCX | GFACX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.89 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.97 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -1.637 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 1.09B | 30,713% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -32.81 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | -55.47 | -65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -76.96 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | -52.53 | -178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement