Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUTX
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Rational Dynamic Brands Instl
Price$63.69
Change-$4.36 (-6.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.56M
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUTX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and HSUTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. HSUTX (58.6M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUTX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUTX: GFACX (25 years) vs HSUTX (23 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than HSUTX (1.19). HSUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUTX: GFACX (250) vs HSUTX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. HSUTX (-8.64). HSUTX return over 5 years is better than : 6.74 vs. GFACX (4.02).
| GFACX | HSUTX | GFACX / HSUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.19 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.19 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -3.879 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 58.6M | 573,379% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -8.64 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 48.36 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | 6.74 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 56.04 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement