Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUTX
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.33
Change-$0.74 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Rational Dynamic Brands Instl
Price$66.33
Change-$0.40 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.08M
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUTX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and HSUTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. HSUTX (64.1M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUTX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUTX: GFACX (25 years) vs HSUTX (23 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than HSUTX (1.19). HSUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUTX: GFACX (250) vs HSUTX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.99 vs. HSUTX (3.17). HSUTX return over 5 years is better than : 16.50 vs. GFACX (10.83).
| GFACX | HSUTX | GFACX / HSUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.19 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.19 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.630 | 0.709 | 371% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 64.1M | 524,181% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.99 | 3.17 | 252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.18 | 66.53 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.83 | 16.50 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.46 | 61.16 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement