Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUTX
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Rational Dynamic Brands Instl
Price$66.02
Change-$0.93 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.24M
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUTX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and HSUTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. HSUTX (65.2M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUTX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUTX: GFACX (25 years) vs HSUTX (23 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than HSUTX (1.19). HSUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUTX: GFACX (250) vs HSUTX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.61 vs. HSUTX (1.55). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.87 vs. HSUTX (14.24).
| GFACX | HSUTX | GFACX / HSUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.19 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.19 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.343 | 0.671 | 2,436% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 65.2M | 521,472% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | 1.55 | 297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.17 | 58.63 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.87 | 14.24 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.78 | 39.06 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement