Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUTX
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.72
Change+$0.95 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Rational Dynamic Brands Instl
Price$68.19
Change+$0.92 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.72M
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUTX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and HSUTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. HSUTX (67.7M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUTX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUTX: GFACX (25 years) vs HSUTX (23 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than HSUTX (1.19). HSUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUTX: GFACX (250) vs HSUTX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. HSUTX (7.20). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. HSUTX (15.31).
| GFACX | HSUTX | GFACX / HSUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.19 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.19 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 2.577 | 670% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 67.7M | 497,784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 7.20 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 75.55 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 15.31 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | -64.59 | -125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement