Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.24
Change-$0.46 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.24M
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and HSUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. HSUCX (65.2M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFACX (25 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.76 vs. HSUCX (2.00). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.74 vs. HSUCX (-8.96).
| GFACX | HSUCX | GFACX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.946 | 1.238 | 1,530% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 65.2M | 521,472% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.76 | 2.00 | 338% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.80 | 44.82 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.74 | -8.96 | -343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.09 | -12.67 | -648% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement