Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.24
Change-$0.11 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.18M
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and HSUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. HSUCX (63.2M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFACX (25 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.83 vs. HSUCX (-0.86). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.69 vs. HSUCX (-1.10).
| GFACX | HSUCX | GFACX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.530 | -0.248 | -618% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 63.2M | 531,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.83 | -0.86 | -561% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.58 | 60.24 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.69 | -1.10 | -968% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.34 | -2.16 | -4,409% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement