Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.08
Change+$0.45 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.60
Change+$0.11 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.71M
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and HSUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. HSUCX (64.7M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFACX (25 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.93 vs. HSUCX (-1.99). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.08 vs. HSUCX (-14.52).
| GFACX | HSUCX | GFACX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.115 | 0.433 | 4,179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 64.7M | 523,957% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.93 | -1.99 | -247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.70 | 47.93 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.08 | -14.52 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.33 | -15.59 | -477% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement