Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.88
Change+$0.31 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.72M
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and HSUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. HSUCX (67.7M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFACX (25 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. HSUCX (6.17). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. HSUCX (-9.40).
| GFACX | HSUCX | GFACX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 1.796 | 962% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 67.7M | 497,784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 6.17 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 62.13 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | -9.40 | -326% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | -82.05 | -98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement