Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HGOCX
GFACX vs HGOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HGOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$63.03
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.81B
GFACX vs HGOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HGOCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and HGOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. HGOCX (6.81B). GFACX (0.00) and HGOCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HGOCX: GFACX (25 years) vs HGOCX (24 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: GFACX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.61 vs. HGOCX (3.04). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.81 vs. HGOCX (-30.34).
| GFACX | HGOCX | GFACX / HGOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.86 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.760 | 6.722 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 6.81B | 4,981% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | 3.04 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.24 | 112.37 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | -30.34 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.42 | -40.63 | -178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers