Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HGOCX
GFACX vs HGOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HGOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$65.84
Change-$1.89 (-2.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.94B
GFACX vs HGOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HGOCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and HGOCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. HGOCX (6.94B). GFACX (0.00) and HGOCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HGOCX: GFACX (25 years) vs HGOCX (24 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: GFACX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.46 vs. GFACX (4.61). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.87 vs. HGOCX (-41.94).
| GFACX | HGOCX | GFACX / HGOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.86 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.343 | 11.480 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 6.94B | 4,901% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | 13.46 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.17 | 109.95 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.87 | -41.94 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.78 | -43.36 | -175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement