Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GERCX vs RNWHX
GERCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GERCX vs RNWHX
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts C
Price$11.01
Change-$0.06 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.63B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
GERCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GERCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GERCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. GERCX (2.63B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than GERCX: RNWHX (0.93) vs GERCX (0.16). GERCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GERCX (18 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GERCX (2.26) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 168.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GERCX: RNWHX (250) vs GERCX (1000). GERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.24 vs. RNWHX (15.38). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.08 vs. GERCX (13.27).
| GERCX | RNWHX | GERCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 0.72 | 290% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.72 | 314% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.023 | 24.375 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 74.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.93 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.24 | 15.38 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.10 | 57.29 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.27 | 29.08 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement