Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GERCX vs RNWHX
GERCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GERCX vs RNWHX
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts C
Price$12.42
Change+$1.32 (+11.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GERCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GERCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GERCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GERCX (2.91B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than GERCX: RNWHX (1.25) vs GERCX (0.91). GERCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GERCX (18 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GERCX (2.26) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GERCX: RNWHX (250) vs GERCX (1000). GERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.76 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. GERCX (3.86).
| GERCX | RNWHX | GERCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 0.72 | 290% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.72 | 314% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.290 | 6.092 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 75.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.25 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.76 | 27.68 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.43 | 43.24 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.86 | 11.69 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.82 | 124.21 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers