Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GERCX vs RNWBX
GERCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GERCX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts C
Price$12.42
Change+$1.32 (+11.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GERCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GERCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GERCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GERCX (2.91B). GERCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GERCX (0.91) vs RNWBX (0.45). GERCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GERCX (18 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). GERCX (2.26) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). GERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GERCX: RNWBX (250) vs GERCX (1000). GERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.76 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. GERCX (3.86).
| GERCX | RNWBX | GERCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.66 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.66 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.290 | 5.996 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 75.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.45 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.76 | 26.27 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.43 | 38.81 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.86 | 7.03 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.82 | 114.19 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement