Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GERCX vs RNWBX
GERCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GERCX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts C
Price$11.05
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
GERCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GERCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GERCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GERCX (2.63B). GERCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GERCX (0.16) vs RNWBX (0.12). GERCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GERCX (18 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). GERCX (2.26) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). GERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 168.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GERCX: RNWBX (250) vs GERCX (1000). GERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.58 vs. RNWBX (18.68). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.66 vs. GERCX (3.75).
| GERCX | RNWBX | GERCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.67 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.67 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.488 | 20.612 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 75.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.12 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.58 | 18.68 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.63 | 40.84 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.75 | 7.66 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.11 | 83.29 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers