Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEOSX vs SFCWX
GEOSX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GEOSX vs SFCWX
Pear Tree Essex Environmental Opps Ins
Price$14.72
Change+$0.20 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.42M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$74.91
Change+$0.44 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.12B
GEOSX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEOSX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEOSX is a StrongBuy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. GEOSX (25.4M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GEOSX: SFCWX (0.94) vs GEOSX (0.00). GEOSX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GEOSX (8 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GEOSX (1.25) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GEOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GEOSX (1000000) and SFCWX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.80 vs. GEOSX (8.16). GEOSX return over 5 years is better than : 39.53 vs. SFCWX (23.80).
| GEOSX | SFCWX | GEOSX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.65 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.65 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.428 | 8.805 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.4M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.94 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | 10.80 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.00 | 36.16 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.53 | 23.80 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers