Advertisement
GEN vs TAOP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEN is a Hold and TAOP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAOP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TAOP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GEN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAOP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TAOP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GEN (@Computer Communications) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while TAOP (@Computer Communications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
GEN is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.28% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| GEN | TAOP | GEN / TAOP | |
| Capitalization | 16.2B | 11.9M | 136,134% |
| EBITDA | 2.06B | 773K | 266,753% |
| Gain YTD | -3.494 | -7.857 | 44% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.84 | 0.20 | 14,418% |
| Revenue | 4.47B | 36.7M | 12,188% |
| Total Cash | 691M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 8.7B | 8.3M | 104,806% |
GEN | TAOP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 2 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GEN's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as TAOP (40) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GEN’s stock grew similarly to TAOP’s over the last 12 months.
GEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAOP (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAOP’s over the last 12 months.
GEN's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAOP (95) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAOP’s over the last 12 months.
GEN's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAOP (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAOP’s over the last 12 months.
GEN's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAOP (95) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAOP’s over the last 12 months.
| GEN | TAOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
GEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEN has been closely correlated with PAYC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GEN jumps, then PAYC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEN | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| PAYC - GEN | 67% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| EEFT - GEN | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.93% | ||
| CPAY - GEN | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| GEHC - GEN | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| ADSK - GEN | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.45% | ||
More | ||||
TAOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TAOP and CFCI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAOP and CFCI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAOP | 100% | -4.44% | ||
| CFCI - TAOP | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UPBD - TAOP | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| HUBS - TAOP | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.79% | ||
| NTAP - TAOP | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| GEN - TAOP | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||