Advertisement
GEN vs PWS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEN is a Buy and PWS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- GEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GEN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GEN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GEN (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.04% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +5.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
GEN is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+5.54% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
GEN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GEN | PWS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 65% | 21 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PSFO | 30.52 | 0.23 | +0.77% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF | |||
| HTRB | 33.74 | 0.05 | +0.15% |
| Hartford Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| EFR | 11.97 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
| Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Fund | |||
| PIFI | 94.57 | N/A | N/A |
| ClearShares Piton Intdt Fxd Inc ETF | |||
| JANM | 31.91 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Jan | |||
GEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEN has been loosely correlated with PAYC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GEN jumps, then PAYC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEN | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| PAYC - GEN | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| CPAY - GEN | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| EEFT - GEN | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| GEHC - GEN | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.14% | ||
| ADSK - GEN | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
More | ||||
PWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PWS and GEN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PWS and GEN's prices will move in lockstep.