Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMUX vs RNWBX
GEMUX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GEMUX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq R6
Price$33.75
Change+$3.60 (+11.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.09B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GEMUX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMUX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMUX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GEMUX (3.09B). GEMUX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GEMUX (0.70) vs RNWBX (0.45). GEMUX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GEMUX (11 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than GEMUX (1.12). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GEMUX (43.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEMUX: RNWBX (250) vs GEMUX (5000000). GEMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.01 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. GEMUX (6.30).
| GEMUX | RNWBX | GEMUX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.66 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.222 | 5.996 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.09B | 75.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.45 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.01 | 26.27 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.84 | 38.81 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.30 | 7.03 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.93 | 114.19 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers