Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMSX vs RNWHX
GEMSX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GEMSX vs RNWHX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq Svc
Price$29.99
Change+$3.25 (+12.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.13B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GEMSX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMSX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMSX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GEMSX (3.13B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than GEMSX: RNWHX (1.25) vs GEMSX (0.39). GEMSX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GEMSX (28 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GEMSX (1.63) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GEMSX (43.00). GEMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: GEMSX (0) vs RNWHX (250). GEMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.22 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. GEMSX (3.61).
| GEMSX | RNWHX | GEMSX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.72 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.72 | 226% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.136 | 6.092 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 75.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.25 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.22 | 27.68 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.51 | 43.24 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.61 | 11.69 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.98 | 124.21 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers