Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMRX vs RNWHX
GEMRX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GEMRX vs RNWHX
abrdn Emerging Markets R
Price$17.94
Change+$0.98 (+5.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets957.46M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GEMRX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMRX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMRX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GEMRX (957M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than GEMRX: RNWHX (1.25) vs GEMRX (0.73). GEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GEMRX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GEMRX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GEMRX (35.00). GEMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: GEMRX (0) vs RNWHX (250). GEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.49 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. GEMRX (-14.44).
| GEMRX | RNWHX | GEMRX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.72 | 242% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.72 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.926 | 6.092 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 957M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.25 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.49 | 27.68 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.16 | 43.24 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.44 | 11.69 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.56 | 124.21 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers