Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMRX vs RNWBX
GEMRX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GEMRX vs RNWBX
abrdn Emerging Markets R
Price$16.35
Change+$0.10 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets892.56M
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
GEMRX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMRX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMRX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GEMRX (893M). GEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GEMRX (0.39) vs RNWBX (0.12). GEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GEMRX (14 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). GEMRX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GEMRX (33.00). GEMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: GEMRX (0) vs RNWBX (250). GEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.11 vs. RNWBX (19.18). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. GEMRX (-13.31).
| GEMRX | RNWBX | GEMRX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.67 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.67 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.864 | 20.884 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 893M | 75.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.12 | 335% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.11 | 19.18 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.31 | 41.02 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.31 | 7.90 | -169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.43 | 82.81 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement