Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMLX vs RNWFX
GEMLX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GEMLX vs RNWFX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Mkts Eq ex. Chn C
Price$17.02
Change+$2.50 (+17.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.93M
American Funds New World R5
Price$99.24
Change+$2.53 (+2.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GEMLX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GEMLX (12.9M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than GEMLX: RNWFX (1.31) vs GEMLX (0.24). GEMLX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GEMLX (3 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). GEMLX (5.38) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GEMLX (39.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEMLX: RNWFX (250) vs GEMLX (1000). GEMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.37 vs. RNWFX (27.90).
| GEMLX | RNWFX | GEMLX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.62 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.38 | 0.62 | 868% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.974 | 6.094 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.31 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.37 | 27.90 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.16 | 43.85 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 12.39 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 127.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement