Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMCX vs RNWHX
GEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GEMCX vs RNWHX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq C
Price$27.41
Change+$3.03 (+12.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.13B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GEMCX (3.13B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than GEMCX: RNWHX (1.25) vs GEMCX (0.00). GEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GEMCX (28 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GEMCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GEMCX (43.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs GEMCX (1000). GEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.41 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. GEMCX (0.79).
| GEMCX | RNWHX | GEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 0.72 | 290% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.72 | 311% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.080 | 6.092 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 75.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.41 | 27.68 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.94 | 43.24 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.79 | 11.69 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.94 | 124.21 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers