Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMCX vs RNWBX
GEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GEMCX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq C
Price$27.41
Change+$3.03 (+12.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.13B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GEMCX (3.13B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than GEMCX: RNWBX (0.45) vs GEMCX (0.00). GEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GEMCX (28 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). GEMCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GEMCX (43.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs GEMCX (1000). GEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.41 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. GEMCX (0.79).
| GEMCX | RNWBX | GEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.66 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.66 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.080 | 5.996 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 75.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.41 | 26.27 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.94 | 38.81 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.79 | 7.03 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.94 | 114.19 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers