GELYF
Price
$2.35
Change
-$0.12 (-4.86%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
23.94B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
XPEV
Price
$21.29
Change
-$0.44 (-2.02%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
20.21B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GELYF vs XPEV

Header iconGELYF vs XPEV Comparison
Open Charts GELYF vs XPEVBanner chart's image
Geely Automobile Holdings
Price$2.35
Change-$0.12 (-4.86%)
Volume$88.37K
Capitalization23.94B
XPeng
Price$21.29
Change-$0.44 (-2.02%)
Volume$5.12M
Capitalization20.21B
GELYF vs XPEV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GELYF vs. XPEV commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GELYF is a Hold and XPEV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (GELYF: $2.35 vs. XPEV: $21.29)
Brand notoriety: GELYF and XPEV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GELYF: 172% vs. XPEV: 56%
Market capitalization -- GELYF: $23.94B vs. XPEV: $20.21B
GELYF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $23.94B. XPEV’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $20.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.43T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $39.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GELYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileXPEV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GELYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • XPEV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GELYF is a better buy in the long-term than XPEV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GELYF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPEV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GELYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • XPEV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GELYF is a better buy in the short-term than XPEV.

Price Growth

GELYF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -4.08% price change this week, while XPEV (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -10.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -5.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

XPEV is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-5.46% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GELYF($23.9B) has a higher market cap than XPEV($20.2B). XPEV YTD gains are higher at: 80.118 vs. GELYF (24.339). GELYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19.1B vs. XPEV (-3.92B). GELYF has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. XPEV (33.9B). XPEV has less debt than GELYF: XPEV (30.7B) vs GELYF (52.1B). GELYF has higher revenues than XPEV: GELYF (272B) vs XPEV (60.3B).
GELYFXPEVGELYF / XPEV
Capitalization23.9B20.2B118%
EBITDA19.1B-3.92B-487%
Gain YTD24.33980.11830%
P/E Ratio11.36N/A-
Revenue272B60.3B451%
Total Cash53.2B33.9B157%
Total Debt52.1B30.7B170%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GELYF: Fundamental Ratings
GELYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GELYFXPEV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GELYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPEV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSLK3.720.09
+2.48%
Bolt Projects Holdings Inc
GTM10.26-0.02
-0.19%
ZOOMINFO Technologies Inc.
PLBY1.41-0.04
-2.76%
Playboy Inc
EDN19.18-0.85
-4.24%
Empresa Distribuidora Y Comercializadora Norte SA
CRDO129.75-20.15
-13.44%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd

GELYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GELYF has been loosely correlated with BYDDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GELYF jumps, then BYDDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GELYF
1D Price
Change %
GELYF100%
-4.86%
BYDDY - GELYF
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
BYDDF - GELYF
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
XPEV - GELYF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
LI - GELYF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
POAHY - GELYF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
More

XPEV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPEV has been loosely correlated with NIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XPEV jumps, then NIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPEV
1D Price
Change %
XPEV100%
-2.02%
NIO - XPEV
66%
Loosely correlated
-5.29%
LI - XPEV
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
ZK - XPEV
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
NIU - XPEV
37%
Loosely correlated
-5.30%
GELYF - XPEV
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.86%
More