GEDSF
Price
$24.85
Change
+$1.15 (+4.85%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.31B
UPC
Price
$4.44
Change
+$0.09 (+2.07%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GEDSF vs UPC

Header iconGEDSF vs UPC Comparison
Open Charts GEDSF vs UPCBanner chart's image
Gedeon Richter
Price$24.85
Change+$1.15 (+4.85%)
Volume$9.5K
Capitalization5.31B
Universe Pharmaceuticals
Price$4.44
Change+$0.09 (+2.07%)
Volume$33.15K
Capitalization2.5M
GEDSF vs UPC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GEDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GEDSF vs. UPC commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEDSF is a Hold and UPC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GEDSF: $22.29 vs. UPC: $4.44)
Brand notoriety: GEDSF and UPC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GEDSF: 100% vs. UPC: 26%
Market capitalization -- GEDSF: $5.31B vs. UPC: $2.5M
GEDSF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $5.31B. UPC’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $2.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GEDSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUPC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GEDSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UPC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GEDSF and UPC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GEDSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GEDSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • UPC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UPC is a better buy in the short-term than GEDSF.

Price Growth

GEDSF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UPC (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -1.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-1.16% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GEDSF($5.31B) has a higher market cap than UPC($2.5M). GEDSF YTD gains are higher at: -4.699 vs. UPC (-81.803). GEDSF has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. UPC (8.86M). UPC has less debt than GEDSF: UPC (6.51M) vs GEDSF (21.6B).
GEDSFUPCGEDSF / UPC
Capitalization5.31B2.5M212,395%
EBITDA335BN/A-
Gain YTD-4.699-81.8036%
P/E Ratio10.64N/A-
Revenue903BN/A-
Total Cash150B8.86M1,692,620%
Total Debt21.6B6.51M331,848%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GEDSF: Fundamental Ratings
GEDSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GEDSFUPC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GEDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SWBI9.700.24
+2.54%
Smith & Wesson Brands
TIMB21.520.23
+1.08%
TIM SA
ATIIU10.31N/A
N/A
Archimedes Tech SPAC Partners II Co
CCOI39.52-0.34
-0.85%
Cogent Communications Holdings
VHC17.14-0.31
-1.78%
VirnetX Holding Corp

GEDSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEDSF has been loosely correlated with HNSPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GEDSF jumps, then HNSPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEDSF
1D Price
Change %
GEDSF100%
N/A
HNSPF - GEDSF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ESAIY - GEDSF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
TSMRF - GEDSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMCC - GEDSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
BGM - GEDSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

UPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UPC and CPHRF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPC and CPHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPC
1D Price
Change %
UPC100%
+2.07%
CPHRF - UPC
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
RAFA - UPC
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
HYEX - UPC
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
IXHL - UPC
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
GEDSF - UPC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More