Advertisement
GECSF vs PGCSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GECSF is a Hold and PGCSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GECSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGCSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GECSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PGCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GECSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GECSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GECSF (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -12.86% price change this week, while PGCSF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.96%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.72%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (+0.59% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.38% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| GECSF | PGCSF | GECSF / PGCSF | |
| Capitalization | 17.4M | 1.68B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -19.76M | 549M | -4% |
| Gain YTD | 49.662 | 63.212 | 79% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.73 | 13.75 | 78% |
| Revenue | 70.3M | 5.03B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 1.09M | 829M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 231M | 2.18B | 11% |
GECSF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GECSF | PGCSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 16% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 17% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
GECSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GECSF and CBZ have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GECSF and CBZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GECSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GECSF | 100% | -3.70% | ||
| CBZ - GECSF | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
| BMBLF - GECSF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SCGPY - GECSF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VRSK - GECSF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| GEO - GECSF | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.06% | ||
More | ||||
PGCSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PGCSF and JZ have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGCSF and JZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGCSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGCSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| JZ - PGCSF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.75% | ||
| PMEC - PGCSF | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.86% | ||
| LICN - PGCSF | 3% Poorly correlated | +12.27% | ||
| QSG - PGCSF | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.62% | ||
| GECSF - PGCSF | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.70% | ||
More | ||||