GECSF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
20.12M
GEO
Price
$24.62
Change
-$1.90 (-7.16%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.81B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GECSF vs GEO

Header iconGECSF vs GEO Comparison
Open Charts GECSF vs GEOBanner chart's image
Global Education Communities
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization20.12M
GEO Group (The)
Price$24.62
Change-$1.90 (-7.16%)
Volume$4.89M
Capitalization1.81B
GECSF vs GEO Comparison Chart
Loading...
GEO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GECSF vs. GEO commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GECSF is a Hold and GEO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (GECSF: $0.20 vs. GEO: $24.62)
Brand notoriety: GECSF and GEO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GECSF: 184% vs. GEO: 165%
Market capitalization -- GECSF: $20.12M vs. GEO: $1.81B
GECSF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $20.12M. GEO’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $1.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GECSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGEO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GECSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GEO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GEO is a better buy in the long-term than GECSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GEO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GEO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GECSF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +7.42% price change this week, while GEO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -8.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

GEO is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.97% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GEO($1.81B) has a higher market cap than GECSF($20.1M). GECSF YTD gains are higher at: 37.838 vs. GEO (-12.009). GEO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 482M vs. GECSF (-45.18M). GEO has more cash in the bank: 94M vs. GECSF (7.57M). GECSF has less debt than GEO: GECSF (282M) vs GEO (1.89B). GEO has higher revenues than GECSF: GEO (2.41B) vs GECSF (75.9M).
GECSFGEOGECSF / GEO
Capitalization20.1M1.81B1%
EBITDA-45.18M482M-9%
Gain YTD37.838-12.009-315%
P/E RatioN/A19.81-
Revenue75.9M2.41B3%
Total Cash7.57M94M8%
Total Debt282M1.89B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GECSF vs GEO: Fundamental Ratings
GECSF
GEO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
9396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
982
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GEO's Valuation (28) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GECSF (59) in the null industry. This means that GEO’s stock grew similarly to GECSF’s over the last 12 months.

GEO's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GECSF (100) in the null industry. This means that GEO’s stock grew somewhat faster than GECSF’s over the last 12 months.

GECSF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as GEO (96) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GECSF’s stock grew similarly to GEO’s over the last 12 months.

GECSF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GEO (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GECSF’s stock grew similarly to GEO’s over the last 12 months.

GEO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for GECSF (98) in the null industry. This means that GEO’s stock grew significantly faster than GECSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GEO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GEO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYPMX172.502.31
+1.36%
Rydex Precious Metals Inv
RMLPX25.020.25
+1.01%
Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Class I
FEIQX32.25-0.23
-0.71%
Franklin Equity Income R6
TWEBX18.58-0.21
-1.12%
Tweedy, Browne Value
AIVSX60.47-0.69
-1.13%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer A

GECSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GECSF and CBZ have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GECSF and CBZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GECSF
1D Price
Change %
GECSF100%
N/A
CBZ - GECSF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
BMBLF - GECSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCGPY - GECSF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRSK - GECSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
GEO - GECSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.16%
More

GEO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEO has been closely correlated with CXW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GEO jumps, then CXW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEO
1D Price
Change %
GEO100%
-7.16%
CXW - GEO
78%
Closely correlated
-4.05%
LOPE - GEO
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
GHC - GEO
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
ATGE - GEO
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
AZZ - GEO
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
More