GECSF vs GEO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GECSF is a Hold and GEO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GECSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGEO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- GECSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GEO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GEO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GEO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GECSF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +1.83% price change this week, while GEO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -7.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +92.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
GEO is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.23% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| GECSF | GEO | GECSF / GEO | |
| Capitalization | 20.1M | 1.81B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -45.18M | 482M | -9% |
| Gain YTD | 5.514 | -9.435 | -58% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 19.81 | - |
| Revenue | 75.9M | 2.41B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 7.57M | 94M | 8% |
| Total Debt | 282M | 1.89B | 15% |
GECSF | GEO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GEO's Valuation (14) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GECSF (59) in the null industry. This means that GEO’s stock grew somewhat faster than GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
GEO's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for GECSF (100) in the null industry. This means that GEO’s stock grew significantly faster than GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
GECSF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as GEO (97) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GECSF’s stock grew similarly to GEO’s over the last 12 months.
GEO's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GECSF (61) in the null industry. This means that GEO’s stock grew similarly to GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
GEO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for GECSF (98) in the null industry. This means that GEO’s stock grew significantly faster than GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
| GEO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% |
GECSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GECSF and CBZ have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GECSF and CBZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GECSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GECSF | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| CBZ - GECSF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.78% | ||
| BMBLF - GECSF | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
| SCGPY - GECSF | 24% Poorly correlated | +4.76% | ||
| VRSK - GECSF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| GEO - GECSF | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.24% | ||
More | ||||
GEO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEO has been closely correlated with CXW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GEO jumps, then CXW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEO | 100% | -5.24% | ||
| CXW - GEO | 79% Closely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| LOPE - GEO | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| LINC - GEO | 35% Loosely correlated | -8.74% | ||
| ATGE - GEO | 31% Poorly correlated | -7.22% | ||
| UTI - GEO | 31% Poorly correlated | -8.11% | ||
More | ||||