GEBHF
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.02 (-2.78%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
3.57B
PYTCF
Price
$4.80
Change
+$0.15 (+3.23%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GEBHF vs PYTCF

Header iconGEBHF vs PYTCF Comparison
Open Charts GEBHF vs PYTCFBanner chart's image
Genting Berhad
Price$0.70
Change-$0.02 (-2.78%)
Volume$236
Capitalization3.57B
Playtech
Price$4.80
Change+$0.15 (+3.23%)
Volume$180
Capitalization2.23B
GEBHF vs PYTCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GEBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYTCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GEBHF vs. PYTCF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEBHF is a Hold and PYTCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GEBHF: $0.70 vs. PYTCF: $4.80)
Brand notoriety: GEBHF and PYTCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GEBHF: 88% vs. PYTCF: 8%
Market capitalization -- GEBHF: $3.57B vs. PYTCF: $2.23B
GEBHF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $3.57B. PYTCF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GEBHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePYTCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GEBHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PYTCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GEBHF is a better buy in the long-term than PYTCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GEBHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PYTCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GEBHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PYTCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GEBHF is a better buy in the short-term than PYTCF.

Price Growth

GEBHF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PYTCF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.58% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GEBHF($3.57B) has a higher market cap than PYTCF($2.23B). GEBHF YTD gains are higher at: -23.680 vs. PYTCF (-48.936). GEBHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.32B vs. PYTCF (647M). GEBHF has more cash in the bank: 22B vs. PYTCF (681M). PYTCF has less debt than GEBHF: PYTCF (1.12B) vs GEBHF (39.5B). GEBHF has higher revenues than PYTCF: GEBHF (24B) vs PYTCF (1.54B).
GEBHFPYTCFGEBHF / PYTCF
Capitalization3.57B2.23B160%
EBITDA7.32B647M1,131%
Gain YTD-23.680-48.93648%
P/E RatioN/A52.91-
Revenue24B1.54B1,558%
Total Cash22B681M3,231%
Total Debt39.5B1.12B3,517%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GEBHF vs PYTCF: Fundamental Ratings
GEBHF
PYTCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
8960
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6465
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
422
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GEBHF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYTCF (57). This means that GEBHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYTCF’s over the last 12 months.

PYTCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as GEBHF (100). This means that PYTCF’s stock grew similarly to GEBHF’s over the last 12 months.

PYTCF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as GEBHF (89). This means that PYTCF’s stock grew similarly to GEBHF’s over the last 12 months.

GEBHF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as PYTCF (65). This means that GEBHF’s stock grew similarly to PYTCF’s over the last 12 months.

GEBHF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as PYTCF (22). This means that GEBHF’s stock grew similarly to PYTCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GEBHFPYTCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GEBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYTCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCISX27.350.26
+0.96%
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders I
VEMPX369.733.42
+0.93%
Vanguard Extended Market Index InstlPlus
GSUSX53.220.45
+0.85%
Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights C
LMNVX129.450.52
+0.40%
ClearBridge Value I
HWMIX55.600.21
+0.38%
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value I

GEBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GEBHF and GAMB have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GEBHF and GAMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEBHF
1D Price
Change %
GEBHF100%
N/A
GAMB - GEBHF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
ARHN - GEBHF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHY - GEBHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
PYTCF - GEBHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHF - GEBHF
16%
Poorly correlated
+5.87%
More

PYTCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PYTCF and KMBIF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PYTCF and KMBIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PYTCF
1D Price
Change %
PYTCF100%
N/A
KMBIF - PYTCF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEBHF - PYTCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBTHF - PYTCF
8%
Poorly correlated
-41.75%
NGCRY - PYTCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDEVF - PYTCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
More