Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GDXJ vs SIL
GDXJ vs SIL Comparison
Open Charts GDXJ vs SIL
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Price$118.97
Change-$1.03 (-0.86%)
Volume$3.19M
Net Assets9.87B
Global X Silver Miners ETF
Price$87.67
Change-$0.76 (-0.86%)
Volume$3.07M
Net Assets5.06B
GDXJ vs SIL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GDXJ vs. SIL commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXJ is a Hold and SIL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDXJ has more net assets: 9.88B vs. SIL (5.06B). GDXJ (178.292) and SIL (176.410) have matching annual dividend yield . GDXJ was incepted earlier than SIL: GDXJ (16 years) vs SIL (16 years). GDXJ (0.51) has a lower expense ratio than SIL (0.65). GDXJ has a higher turnover SIL (14.67) vs SIL (14.67).
| GDXJ | SIL | GDXJ / SIL | |
| Gain YTD | 178.292 | 176.410 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 9.88B | 5.06B | 195% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.65 | 78% |
| Turnover | 28.00 | 14.67 | 191% |
| Yield | 1.02 | 1.08 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GDXJ | SIL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GDXJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDXJ has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDXJ jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDXJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXJ | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| AEM - GDXJ | 91% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| AGI - GDXJ | 90% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| PAAS - GDXJ | 88% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| CGAU - GDXJ | 87% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| KGC - GDXJ | 87% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||
SIL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIL | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| PAAS - SIL | 91% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| WPM - SIL | 88% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| CDE - SIL | 82% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| VZLA - SIL | 80% Closely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| OR - SIL | 80% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||