GDS
Price
$33.98
Change
+$3.15 (+10.22%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.93B
51 days until earnings call
NABL
Price
$8.25
Change
+$0.07 (+0.86%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.56B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDS vs NABL

Header iconGDS vs NABL Comparison
Open Charts GDS vs NABLBanner chart's image
GDS Holdings
Price$33.98
Change+$3.15 (+10.22%)
Volume$3.5M
Capitalization5.93B
N-able
Price$8.25
Change+$0.07 (+0.86%)
Volume$481.62K
Capitalization1.56B
GDS vs NABL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NABL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDS vs. NABL commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDS is a Buy and NABL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GDS: $33.98 vs. NABL: $8.25)
Brand notoriety: GDS and NABL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDS: 178% vs. NABL: 38%
Market capitalization -- GDS: $5.93B vs. NABL: $1.56B
GDS [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $5.93B. NABL’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $1.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $271.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNABL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NABL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GDS is a better buy in the long-term than NABL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NABL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NABL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NABL is a better buy in the short-term than GDS.

Price Growth

GDS (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +14.45% price change this week, while NABL (@Information Technology Services) price change was +5.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

GDS is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

NABL is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+2.78% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDS($5.93B) has a higher market cap than NABL($1.56B). GDS has higher P/E ratio than NABL: GDS (304.38) vs NABL (103.13). GDS YTD gains are higher at: 43.013 vs. NABL (-11.670). GDS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.92B vs. NABL (97.1M). GDS has more cash in the bank: 7.58B vs. NABL (94.1M). NABL has less debt than GDS: NABL (370M) vs GDS (43.9B). GDS has higher revenues than NABL: GDS (10.6B) vs NABL (471M).
GDSNABLGDS / NABL
Capitalization5.93B1.56B380%
EBITDA5.92B97.1M6,095%
Gain YTD43.013-11.670-369%
P/E Ratio304.38103.13295%
Revenue10.6B471M2,251%
Total Cash7.58B94.1M8,051%
Total Debt43.9B370M11,865%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDS: Fundamental Ratings
GDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDSNABL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NABL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTCBX45.870.67
+1.48%
MFS Technology B
MSCFX29.230.10
+0.34%
Mairs & Power Small Cap
MDODX11.300.03
+0.27%
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity R6
VIHAX39.160.09
+0.23%
Vanguard Intl Hi Div Yld Adm
PIGRX16.32N/A
N/A
Putnam International Value C

GDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDS has been loosely correlated with VNET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDS jumps, then VNET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDS
1D Price
Change %
GDS100%
+10.20%
VNET - GDS
59%
Loosely correlated
+9.46%
TSYHY - GDS
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
NABL - GDS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
III - GDS
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
CNXC - GDS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
More

NABL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NABL has been loosely correlated with VYX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NABL jumps, then VYX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NABL
1D Price
Change %
NABL100%
+0.86%
VYX - NABL
43%
Loosely correlated
+4.48%
CDW - NABL
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
IT - NABL
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
PENG - NABL
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
DXC - NABL
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
More