It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GDS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNABL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GDS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NABL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
GDS (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +1.58% price change this week, while NABL (@Information Technology Services) price change was -4.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -3.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.64%.
GDS is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.
NABL is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
GDS | NABL | GDS / NABL | |
Capitalization | 4.96B | 1.47B | 338% |
EBITDA | 5.92B | 97.1M | 6,095% |
Gain YTD | 8.081 | -16.809 | -48% |
P/E Ratio | 230.92 | 97.13 | 238% |
Revenue | 10.6B | 471M | 2,251% |
Total Cash | 7.58B | 94.1M | 8,051% |
Total Debt | 43.9B | 370M | 11,865% |
GDS | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GDS | NABL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago76% | 6 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 4 days ago59% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago62% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
URNM | 43.28 | 0.38 | +0.89% |
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | |||
XDSQ | 36.93 | -0.16 | -0.43% |
Innovator US Eq Acltd ETF™ Quarterly | |||
NMAI | 12.31 | -0.07 | -0.60% |
Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund | |||
VWO | 48.38 | -0.74 | -1.51% |
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | |||
PCGG | 11.88 | -0.20 | -1.66% |
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDS has been loosely correlated with VNET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDS jumps, then VNET could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GDS | 100% | -3.89% | ||
VNET - GDS | 59% Loosely correlated | -5.88% | ||
TSYHY - GDS | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.40% | ||
NABL - GDS | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.84% | ||
III - GDS | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
CNXC - GDS | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.20% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NABL has been loosely correlated with VYX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NABL jumps, then VYX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NABL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NABL | 100% | -3.84% | ||
VYX - NABL | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
CDW - NABL | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
IT - NABL | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.08% | ||
ASGN - NABL | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.49% | ||
CNDT - NABL | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
More |