GDRZF
Price
$1.96
Change
+$0.01 (+0.51%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
295.89M
MTA
Price
$3.63
Change
+$0.04 (+1.11%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
284.03M
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDRZF vs MTA

Header iconGDRZF vs MTA Comparison
Open Charts GDRZF vs MTABanner chart's image
Gold Reserve Ltd. (Bermuda)
Price$1.96
Change+$0.01 (+0.51%)
Volume$34.1K
Capitalization295.89M
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
Price$3.63
Change+$0.04 (+1.11%)
Volume$704.17K
Capitalization284.03M
GDRZF vs MTA Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDRZF vs. MTA commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDRZF is a Hold and MTA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (GDRZF: $1.53 vs. MTA: $3.06)
Brand notoriety: GDRZF and MTA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDRZF: 129% vs. MTA: 84%
Market capitalization -- GDRZF: $295.89M vs. MTA: $284.03M
GDRZF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $295.89M. MTA’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $284.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDRZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GDRZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTA is a better buy in the long-term than GDRZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GDRZF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.38% price change this week, while MTA (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTA is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDRZF($296M) and MTA($284M) have the same market capitalization . MTA YTD gains are higher at: 21.912 vs. GDRZF (-3.165). MTA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -917K vs. GDRZF (-7.09M). GDRZF has more cash in the bank: 41.6M vs. MTA (14.1M). GDRZF has less debt than MTA: GDRZF (0) vs MTA (14.6M). MTA has higher revenues than GDRZF: MTA (4.6M) vs GDRZF (0).
GDRZFMTAGDRZF / MTA
Capitalization296M284M104%
EBITDA-7.09M-917K773%
Gain YTD-3.16521.912-14%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue04.6M-
Total Cash41.6M14.1M295%
Total Debt014.6M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDRZF vs MTA: Fundamental Ratings
GDRZF
MTA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
615
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
9592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8556
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTA's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GDRZF (71). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to GDRZF’s over the last 12 months.

GDRZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (100). This means that GDRZF’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GDRZF (95). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to GDRZF’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as GDRZF (85). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to GDRZF’s over the last 12 months.

GDRZF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTA (100). This means that GDRZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

GDRZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GDRZF and RMLFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDRZF and RMLFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDRZF
1D Price
Change %
GDRZF100%
+9.29%
RMLFF - GDRZF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
MTA - GDRZF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
ITRG - GDRZF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
SBSW - GDRZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
EQX - GDRZF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
More

MTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTA has been closely correlated with CGAU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTA jumps, then CGAU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTA
1D Price
Change %
MTA100%
+1.32%
CGAU - MTA
70%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
SA - MTA
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
PAAS - MTA
68%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
OR - MTA
68%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
ASM - MTA
68%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
More