GDQMF
Price
$0.62
Change
+$0.01 (+1.64%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.62M
GMBXF
Price
$6.07
Change
+$0.09 (+1.51%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
40.64B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDQMF vs GMBXF

Header iconGDQMF vs GMBXF Comparison
Open Charts GDQMF vs GMBXFBanner chart's image
Goldquest Mining
Price$0.62
Change+$0.01 (+1.64%)
Volume$9.45K
Capitalization17.62M
Grupo Mexico S.A.B. de C.V
Price$6.07
Change+$0.09 (+1.51%)
Volume$1.51K
Capitalization40.64B
GDQMF vs GMBXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GDQMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDQMF vs. GMBXF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDQMF is a StrongBuy and GMBXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GDQMF: $0.62 vs. GMBXF: $6.07)
Brand notoriety: GDQMF and GMBXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDQMF: 12% vs. GMBXF: 12%
Market capitalization -- GDQMF: $17.62M vs. GMBXF: $40.64B
GDQMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $17.62M. GMBXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $40.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDQMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMBXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GDQMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GMBXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMBXF is a better buy in the long-term than GDQMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDQMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMBXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDQMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GMBXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GMBXF is a better buy in the short-term than GDQMF.

Price Growth

GDQMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.41% price change this week, while GMBXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

GMBXF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMBXF($40.6B) has a higher market cap than GDQMF($17.6M). GDQMF YTD gains are higher at: 224.502 vs. GMBXF (29.424). GMBXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.1B vs. GDQMF (-3.25M). GMBXF has more cash in the bank: 6.63B vs. GDQMF (11M). GDQMF has less debt than GMBXF: GDQMF (0) vs GMBXF (8.82B). GMBXF has higher revenues than GDQMF: GMBXF (14B) vs GDQMF (0).
GDQMFGMBXFGDQMF / GMBXF
Capitalization17.6M40.6B0%
EBITDA-3.25M7.1B-0%
Gain YTD224.50229.424763%
P/E RatioN/A12.74-
Revenue014B-
Total Cash11M6.63B0%
Total Debt08.82B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDQMF vs GMBXF: Fundamental Ratings
GDQMF
GMBXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2531
SMR RATING
1..100
9648
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10070
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GMBXF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDQMF (72). This means that GMBXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDQMF’s over the last 12 months.

GDQMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as GMBXF (31). This means that GDQMF’s stock grew similarly to GMBXF’s over the last 12 months.

GMBXF's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDQMF (96). This means that GMBXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDQMF’s over the last 12 months.

GDQMF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as GMBXF (43). This means that GDQMF’s stock grew similarly to GMBXF’s over the last 12 months.

GMBXF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as GDQMF (100). This means that GMBXF’s stock grew similarly to GDQMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDQMFGMBXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDQMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRIM84.712.71
+3.30%
Primoris Services Corp
MAX10.500.10
+0.96%
MediaAlpha
AJG318.102.36
+0.75%
Arthur J Gallagher & Co
CDXS2.77-0.04
-1.42%
Codexis
EJH2.70-0.10
-3.57%
E-Home Household Service Holdings Limited

GDQMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GDQMF and SILEF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDQMF and SILEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDQMF
1D Price
Change %
GDQMF100%
+0.72%
SILEF - GDQMF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPL - GDQMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GENMF - GDQMF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
GLCNF - GDQMF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
GMBXF - GDQMF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
More

GMBXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMBXF has been loosely correlated with IVPAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMBXF jumps, then IVPAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMBXF
1D Price
Change %
GMBXF100%
+1.51%
IVPAF - GMBXF
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
LUNMF - GMBXF
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
GLNCY - GMBXF
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
CSCCF - GMBXF
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
GLCNF - GMBXF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
More