GDQMF
Price
$0.74
Change
+$0.04 (+5.71%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
256.82M
GLCNF
Price
$4.54
Change
+$0.12 (+2.71%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
52.93B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDQMF vs GLCNF

Header iconGDQMF vs GLCNF Comparison
Open Charts GDQMF vs GLCNFBanner chart's image
Goldquest Mining
Price$0.74
Change+$0.04 (+5.71%)
Volume$82.15K
Capitalization256.82M
Glencore
Price$4.54
Change+$0.12 (+2.71%)
Volume$5.08K
Capitalization52.93B
GDQMF vs GLCNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GDQMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDQMF vs. GLCNF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDQMF is a Hold and GLCNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GDQMF: $0.74 vs. GLCNF: $4.54)
Brand notoriety: GDQMF and GLCNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDQMF: 123% vs. GLCNF: 13%
Market capitalization -- GDQMF: $256.82M vs. GLCNF: $52.93B
GDQMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $256.82M. GLCNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $52.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDQMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLCNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GDQMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLCNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GDQMF is a better buy in the long-term than GLCNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDQMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLCNF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDQMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLCNF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLCNF is a better buy in the short-term than GDQMF.

Price Growth

GDQMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.51% price change this week, while GLCNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +7.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLCNF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLCNF($52.9B) has a higher market cap than GDQMF($257M). GDQMF YTD gains are higher at: 286.569 vs. GLCNF (5.838). GLCNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.13B vs. GDQMF (-4.75M). GLCNF has more cash in the bank: 2.68B vs. GDQMF (28.9M). GLCNF has higher revenues than GDQMF: GLCNF (231B) vs GDQMF (0).
GDQMFGLCNFGDQMF / GLCNF
Capitalization257M52.9B0%
EBITDA-4.75M8.13B-0%
Gain YTD286.5695.8384,909%
P/E RatioN/A14.75-
Revenue0231B-
Total Cash28.9M2.68B1%
Total DebtN/A41.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDQMF vs GLCNF: Fundamental Ratings
GDQMF
GLCNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3852
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10057
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GDQMF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as GLCNF (94). This means that GDQMF’s stock grew similarly to GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.

GDQMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GLCNF (52). This means that GDQMF’s stock grew similarly to GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.

GDQMF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as GLCNF (100). This means that GDQMF’s stock grew similarly to GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.

GDQMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GLCNF (46). This means that GDQMF’s stock grew similarly to GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.

GLCNF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDQMF (100). This means that GLCNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDQMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDQMFGLCNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDQMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTEK4.190.75
+21.80%
Maris-Tech Ltd
MAT16.900.24
+1.44%
Mattel
MCO476.744.05
+0.86%
Moody's Corp
CTS39.32-0.33
-0.83%
CTS Corp
OM14.52-0.19
-1.29%
Outset Medical Inc

GDQMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GDQMF and SILEF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDQMF and SILEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDQMF
1D Price
Change %
GDQMF100%
+5.41%
SILEF - GDQMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+10.17%
XPL - GDQMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
GENMF - GDQMF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.16%
GLCNF - GDQMF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
GMBXF - GDQMF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More

GLCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLCNF has been closely correlated with GLNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLCNF jumps, then GLNCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLCNF
1D Price
Change %
GLCNF100%
+2.71%
GLNCY - GLCNF
89%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
BDNNY - GLCNF
67%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
RIO - GLCNF
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
BHP - GLCNF
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
IVPAF - GLCNF
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.63%
More