GDOT
Price
$9.91
Change
+$0.27 (+2.80%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
529.15M
Earnings call today
SYF
Price
$69.61
Change
+$0.18 (+0.26%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.83B
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDOT vs SYF

Header iconGDOT vs SYF Comparison
Open Charts GDOT vs SYFBanner chart's image
Green Dot
Price$9.91
Change+$0.27 (+2.80%)
Volume$39.48K
Capitalization529.15M
Synchrony Financial
Price$69.61
Change+$0.18 (+0.26%)
Volume$35.48K
Capitalization25.83B
GDOT vs SYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GDOT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDOT vs. SYF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDOT is a Hold and SYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (GDOT: $9.64 vs. SYF: $69.43)
Brand notoriety: GDOT: Not notable vs. SYF: Notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDOT: 88% vs. SYF: 82%
Market capitalization -- GDOT: $529.15M vs. SYF: $25.9B
GDOT [@Savings Banks] is valued at $529.15M. SYF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $25.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $653.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDOT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GDOT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SYF is a better buy in the long-term than GDOT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDOT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDOT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GDOT is a better buy in the short-term than SYF.

Price Growth

GDOT (@Savings Banks) experienced а -4.74% price change this week, while SYF (@Savings Banks) price change was +3.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

GDOT is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

SYF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.19% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SYF($25.8B) has a higher market cap than GDOT($529M). GDOT has higher P/E ratio than SYF: GDOT (71.31) vs SYF (8.44). SYF YTD gains are higher at: 8.270 vs. GDOT (-9.398). GDOT has less debt than SYF: GDOT (73.4M) vs SYF (16B).
GDOTSYFGDOT / SYF
Capitalization529M25.8B2%
EBITDA126MN/A-
Gain YTD-9.3988.270-114%
P/E Ratio71.318.44845%
Revenue1.83BN/A-
Total Cash1.88BN/A-
Total Debt73.4M16B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDOT vs SYF: Fundamental Ratings
GDOT
SYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10022
SMR RATING
1..100
914
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
323
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SYF's Valuation (74) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as GDOT (95). This means that SYF’s stock grew similarly to GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for GDOT (100). This means that SYF’s stock grew significantly faster than GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's SMR Rating (4) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for GDOT (91). This means that SYF’s stock grew significantly faster than GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as GDOT (61). This means that SYF’s stock grew similarly to GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

GDOT's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SYF (23). This means that GDOT’s stock grew similarly to SYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDOTSYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDOT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLRYX48.620.42
+0.87%
SEI Large Cap Growth Y (SIMT)
REQAX46.520.33
+0.71%
Russell Sustnbl Aware Eq A
NCGFX68.340.47
+0.69%
New Covenant Growth
RYLVX107.740.55
+0.51%
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value A
OAZBX36.870.11
+0.30%
Oakmark Equity and Income R6

GDOT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDOT has been loosely correlated with NAVI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDOT jumps, then NAVI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDOT
1D Price
Change %
GDOT100%
-0.62%
NAVI - GDOT
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
NNI - GDOT
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
BFH - GDOT
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
SYF - GDOT
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
SLM - GDOT
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
More

SYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SYF has been closely correlated with COF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SYF jumps, then COF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SYF
1D Price
Change %
SYF100%
+1.43%
COF - SYF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
BFH - SYF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
AXP - SYF
84%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
OMF - SYF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
ENVA - SYF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
More