GDNGY
Price
$2.25
Change
+$0.13 (+6.13%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.04B
JAPAF
Price
$32.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
57.25B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDNGY vs JAPAF

Header iconGDNGY vs JAPAF Comparison
Open Charts GDNGY vs JAPAFBanner chart's image
Gudang Garam Pt
Price$2.25
Change+$0.13 (+6.13%)
Volume$190
Capitalization1.04B
Japan Tobac
Price$32.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization57.25B
GDNGY vs JAPAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GDNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JAPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDNGY vs. JAPAF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDNGY is a StrongBuy and JAPAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GDNGY: $2.25 vs. JAPAF: $32.51)
Brand notoriety: GDNGY and JAPAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Tobacco industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDNGY: 7% vs. JAPAF: 1083%
Market capitalization -- GDNGY: $1.04B vs. JAPAF: $57.25B
GDNGY [@Tobacco] is valued at $1.04B. JAPAF’s [@Tobacco] market capitalization is $57.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tobacco] industry ranges from $258.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $32.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDNGY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileJAPAF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GDNGY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • JAPAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, JAPAF is a better buy in the long-term than GDNGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDNGY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JAPAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDNGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JAPAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JAPAF is a better buy in the short-term than GDNGY.

Price Growth

GDNGY (@Tobacco) experienced а +2.27% price change this week, while JAPAF (@Tobacco) price change was -4.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +3.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Tobacco (+3.84% weekly)

The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JAPAF($57.3B) has a higher market cap than GDNGY($1.04B). GDNGY has higher P/E ratio than JAPAF: GDNGY (100.77) vs JAPAF (43.79). JAPAF YTD gains are higher at: 14.070 vs. GDNGY (-28.523).
GDNGYJAPAFGDNGY / JAPAF
Capitalization1.04B57.3B2%
EBITDAN/A635B-
Gain YTD-28.52314.070-203%
P/E Ratio100.7743.79230%
RevenueN/A3.31T-
Total CashN/A965B-
Total DebtN/A1.63T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDNGY vs JAPAF: Fundamental Ratings
GDNGY
JAPAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2097
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
7100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GDNGY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as JAPAF (16). This means that GDNGY’s stock grew similarly to JAPAF’s over the last 12 months.

JAPAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GDNGY (100). This means that JAPAF’s stock grew significantly faster than GDNGY’s over the last 12 months.

GDNGY's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JAPAF (100). This means that GDNGY’s stock grew significantly faster than JAPAF’s over the last 12 months.

JAPAF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDNGY (83). This means that JAPAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDNGY’s over the last 12 months.

GDNGY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as JAPAF (5). This means that GDNGY’s stock grew similarly to JAPAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDNGYJAPAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JAPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTSGX18.740.06
+0.32%
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Z
SWLVX15.49-0.03
-0.18%
Schwab ® US Large-Cap Value Index
PNAIX81.55-0.17
-0.21%
T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities-I
HSLVX47.45-0.11
-0.23%
Hartford Small Cap Growth R6
WCMFX11.71-0.06
-0.51%
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional

GDNGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GDNGY and GRAM have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDNGY and GRAM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDNGY
1D Price
Change %
GDNGY100%
+5.88%
GRAM - GDNGY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAPAF - GDNGY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PHJMF - GDNGY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMBBF - GDNGY
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
JAPAY - GDNGY
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
More

JAPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JAPAF and IMBBY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JAPAF and IMBBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JAPAF
1D Price
Change %
JAPAF100%
N/A
IMBBY - JAPAF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
GDNGY - JAPAF
12%
Poorly correlated
+5.88%
GRAM - JAPAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VPRB - JAPAF
6%
Poorly correlated
-8.68%
JAPAY - JAPAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
More