GDNGY
Price
$2.35
Change
+$0.10 (+4.44%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.03B
IMBBF
Price
$42.23
Change
+$1.07 (+2.60%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
34.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDNGY vs IMBBF

Header iconGDNGY vs IMBBF Comparison
Open Charts GDNGY vs IMBBFBanner chart's image
Gudang Garam Pt
Price$2.35
Change+$0.10 (+4.44%)
Volume$78.81K
Capitalization1.03B
Imperial Brands
Price$42.23
Change+$1.07 (+2.60%)
Volume$456
Capitalization34.1B
GDNGY vs IMBBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GDNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IMBBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDNGY vs. IMBBF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDNGY is a Hold and IMBBF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GDNGY: $2.35 vs. IMBBF: $42.23)
Brand notoriety: GDNGY and IMBBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Tobacco industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDNGY: 1108% vs. IMBBF: 19%
Market capitalization -- GDNGY: $1.03B vs. IMBBF: $34.1B
GDNGY [@Tobacco] is valued at $1.03B. IMBBF’s [@Tobacco] market capitalization is $34.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tobacco] industry ranges from $251.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $31.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDNGY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIMBBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GDNGY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IMBBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IMBBF is a better buy in the long-term than GDNGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDNGY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IMBBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDNGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IMBBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IMBBF is a better buy in the short-term than GDNGY.

Price Growth

GDNGY (@Tobacco) experienced а +10.85% price change this week, while IMBBF (@Tobacco) price change was -1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Tobacco (-2.14% weekly)

The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMBBF($34.1B) has a higher market cap than GDNGY($1.03B). GDNGY has higher P/E ratio than IMBBF: GDNGY (107.56) vs IMBBF (10.49). IMBBF YTD gains are higher at: 32.882 vs. GDNGY (-25.346). GDNGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.67T vs. IMBBF (4.29B). GDNGY has more cash in the bank: 3.98T vs. IMBBF (599M). IMBBF has less debt than GDNGY: IMBBF (10.9B) vs GDNGY (5.21T). GDNGY has higher revenues than IMBBF: GDNGY (93.01T) vs IMBBF (32B).
GDNGYIMBBFGDNGY / IMBBF
Capitalization1.03B34.1B3%
EBITDA1.67T4.29B38,847%
Gain YTD-25.34632.882-77%
P/E Ratio107.5610.491,026%
Revenue93.01T32B290,641%
Total Cash3.98T599M663,606%
Total Debt5.21T10.9B47,752%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDNGY vs IMBBF: Fundamental Ratings
GDNGY
IMBBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
773
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
237
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IMBBF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as GDNGY (11). This means that IMBBF’s stock grew similarly to GDNGY’s over the last 12 months.

IMBBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GDNGY (100). This means that IMBBF’s stock grew significantly faster than GDNGY’s over the last 12 months.

GDNGY's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IMBBF (73). This means that GDNGY’s stock grew significantly faster than IMBBF’s over the last 12 months.

IMBBF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as GDNGY (60). This means that IMBBF’s stock grew similarly to GDNGY’s over the last 12 months.

GDNGY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMBBF (37). This means that GDNGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMBBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDNGYIMBBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IMBBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICUI131.245.61
+4.47%
ICU Medical
LPTX0.28N/A
+0.11%
Leap Therapeutics
NTRS127.27-1.42
-1.10%
Northern Trust Corp
GRNT5.33-0.09
-1.66%
Granite Ridge Resources
ROMA2.43-0.13
-5.22%
Roma Green Finance Limited

GDNGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GDNGY and GRAM have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDNGY and GRAM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDNGY
1D Price
Change %
GDNGY100%
N/A
GRAM - GDNGY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAPAF - GDNGY
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
PHJMF - GDNGY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMBBF - GDNGY
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.59%
JAPAY - GDNGY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More

IMBBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMBBF and BTAFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMBBF and BTAFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMBBF
1D Price
Change %
IMBBF100%
+2.59%
BTAFF - IMBBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAPAY - IMBBF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
GDNGY - IMBBF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VPRB - IMBBF
0%
Poorly correlated
-29.88%
PHJMF - IMBBF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More