Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GDMA vs RULE
GDMA vs RULE Comparison
Open Charts GDMA vs RULE
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
Price$38.67
Change-$0.35 (-0.90%)
Volume$2.28K
Net Assets158.85M
Adaptive Core ETF
Price$22.63
Change-$0.69 (-2.96%)
Volume$170
Net Assets12.17M
GDMA vs RULE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GDMA vs. RULE commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDMA is a Hold and RULE is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDMA has more net assets: 159M vs. RULE (12.2M). GDMA has a higher annual dividend yield than RULE: GDMA (23.394) vs RULE (6.400). GDMA was incepted earlier than RULE: GDMA (7 years) vs RULE (4 years). GDMA (0.78) has a lower expense ratio than RULE (1.22). GDMA has a higher turnover RULE (451.00) vs RULE (451.00).
| GDMA | RULE | GDMA / RULE | |
| Gain YTD | 23.394 | 6.400 | 366% |
| Net Assets | 159M | 12.2M | 1,303% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.22 | 64% |
| Turnover | 674.00 | 451.00 | 149% |
| Yield | 1.88 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GDMA | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 18 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 55% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GDMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GDMA and NEM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDMA and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDMA | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| NEM - GDMA | 16% Poorly correlated | +3.47% | ||
| LMT - GDMA | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.01% | ||
| AEE - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| NOC - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
| DLTR - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||
RULE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RULE and NWE have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RULE and NWE's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RULE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RULE | 100% | N/A | ||
| NWE - RULE | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| CNS - RULE | 17% Poorly correlated | -3.12% | ||
| MS - RULE | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
| USB - RULE | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
| PRGO - RULE | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||